Piltdown man dating method
Unfortunately, these facts were unknown; if people had been aware of them, perhaps they would not have taken his Piltdown fossils seriously.English scientists had determined that they were most likely to uncover a British early man in the Pleistocene gravel pits in Southern England.
The Museum also has a large collection of photographs of the original findings and cranial restoration.
For more than a century, the identity of the creator of the fake fossils was unknown, but De Groote's study, published in August 2016 by Royal Society Open Science, determined that Dawson was the most likely sole forger.
According to Peter Hancock, author of "Hoax Springs Eternal: The Psychology of Cognitive Deception," the Piltdown Man hoax really begins with the 1859 publication of Charles Darwin's "On the Origin of Species." If Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection was true, people thought, there should be fossils that clearly connected apes to modern humans.
Their results showed that the skull and jaw fragments actually came from two different species, a human and an ape, probably an orangutan.
Scratches on the surfaces of the teeth, visible under the microscope, revealed that the teeth had been filed down to make them look human.